tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4110180.post113778726019730865..comments2025-07-21T06:33:41.604-07:00Howard Lewis Shiphttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04486596490758986709noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4110180.post-1138386779437551322006-01-27T10:32:00.000-08:002006-01-27T10:32:00.000-08:00I work for a company located here in Beaverton. I was given a choice of a framework for a small app that whould be able to run in Pocket IE as well as IE 6. After much experimenting with Echo2, Tapestry, Wicket, and JSF, I picked Tapestry. I have to admit that it was the right choice. Because of using Tapestry 4 and Java 1.5, I was able to minimize the number of xml files as well as the amount of code it took to create the app. I can even claim that developing with Tapestry was fun and easy. I only have one complain: nobody ever replies to my postings on Tapesrty Forums ;-).Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4110180.post-1138119751565894682006-01-24T08:22:00.000-08:002006-01-24T08:22:00.000-08:00Howard,<BR/><BR/>Are you implying that Tapestry was not getting the respect it deserved in Boston?<BR/><BR/>I'm not from Boston, but during the couple of times that I've been there, I found Boston to be more tech-savvy than some other East-coast cities.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com