tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24599054.post4548292151438437146..comments2024-09-24T06:50:03.739-07:00Comments on On Ruby: Ruby.NET Interview With M. David Petersongnupatehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10492341480170667775noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24599054.post-2155119409408864512010-07-12T21:54:55.755-07:002010-07-12T21:54:55.755-07:00hey is it real for ruby.NET??hey is it real for ruby.NET??divahttp://linux.blog.gunadarma.ac.idnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24599054.post-20194185622032708882008-01-03T03:01:00.000-07:002008-01-03T03:01:00.000-07:00John Lam followed up here. It looks like he avoide...John Lam followed up <A HREF="http://www.iunknown.com/2008/01/ironruby-vs-rub.html" REL="nofollow">here</A>. It looks like he avoided all reference to community involvement and collaboration. <BR/><BR/>FWIW, I agree with the first Anonymous comment.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24599054.post-31699367777546338612007-12-29T20:47:00.000-07:002007-12-29T20:47:00.000-07:00I've been a sideline observer of both the IronRub...I've been a sideline observer of both the IronRuby and Ruby.NET projects for some time now, and I find it very dissapointing how these two projects haven't bothered to converge or collaborate. <BR/><BR/>Despite numerous posts from John Lam and Jim Hugunin about their intended openness and embracement of the compiler construction community, there seems to be very little of that going on. Instead,Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com