view share/roundup/templates/minimal/schema.py @ 5132:0142b4fb5a2d

issue2550648 - partial fix for problem in this issue. Ezio Melotti reported that the expression editor allowed the user to generate an expression using retired values. To align the expression editor with the simple dropdown search item, retired values are now removed from the expression editor. Do we really want this though? Supposed a keyword is retired and I want to search for an issue with that retired keyword? Do we have a best policy document that says to remove retired keywords from all places it could possibly be used? It could be argued that the simple search dropdown is wrong and should allow selecting retired values.
author John Rouillard <rouilj@ieee.org>
date Fri, 08 Jul 2016 19:31:02 -0400
parents a403c29ffaf9
children 94a7669677ae
line wrap: on
line source

#
# TRACKER SCHEMA
#

# Class automatically gets these properties:
#   creation = Date()
#   activity = Date()
#   creator = Link('user')
#   actor = Link('user')

# The "Minimal" template gets only one class, the required "user"
# class. That's it. And even that has the bare minimum of properties.

# Note: roles is a comma-separated string of Role names
user = Class(db, "user", username=String(), password=Password(),
    address=String(), alternate_addresses=String(), roles=String())
user.setkey("username")
db.security.addPermission(name='Register', klass='user',
                          description='User is allowed to register new user')
#
# TRACKER SECURITY SETTINGS
#
# See the configuration and customisation document for information
# about security setup.

#
# REGULAR USERS
#
# Give the regular users access to the web and email interface
db.security.addPermissionToRole('User', 'Web Access')
db.security.addPermissionToRole('User', 'Email Access')

# May users view other user information?
# Comment these lines out if you don't want them to
p = db.security.addPermission(name='View', klass='user', 
    properties=('id', 'username'))
db.security.addPermissionToRole('User', p)

# Users should be able to edit their own details -- this permission is
# limited to only the situation where the Viewed or Edited item is their own.
def own_record(db, userid, itemid):
    '''Determine whether the userid matches the item being accessed.'''
    return userid == itemid
p = db.security.addPermission(name='View', klass='user', check=own_record,
    description="User is allowed to view their own user details")
db.security.addPermissionToRole('User', p)
p = db.security.addPermission(name='Edit', klass='user', check=own_record,
    properties=('username', 'password', 'address', 'alternate_addresses'),
    description="User is allowed to edit their own user details")
db.security.addPermissionToRole('User', p)

#
# ANONYMOUS USER PERMISSIONS
#
# Let anonymous users access the web interface. Note that almost all
# trackers will need this Permission. The only situation where it's not
# required is in a tracker that uses an HTTP Basic Authenticated front-end.
db.security.addPermissionToRole('Anonymous', 'Web Access')

# Let anonymous users access the email interface (note that this implies
# that they will be registered automatically, hence they will need the
# "Create" user Permission below)
db.security.addPermissionToRole('Anonymous', 'Email Access')

# Assign the appropriate permissions to the anonymous user's
# Anonymous Role. Choices here are:
# - Allow anonymous users to register
db.security.addPermissionToRole('Anonymous', 'Register', 'user')

# vim: set et sts=4 sw=4 :

Roundup Issue Tracker: http://roundup-tracker.org/