tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-606209712314101104.post3600371935755153594..comments2026-01-30T06:37:25.160-08:00Comments on Writability: What We Talk About When We Talk About VoiceGabe (Ava Jae)http://www.blogger.com/profile/04778524723148508140noreply@blogger.comBlogger12125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-606209712314101104.post-20860720292208428482014-11-29T03:25:11.550-08:002014-11-29T03:25:11.550-08:00Yeah, I think it depends on the MS, but the narrat...Yeah, I think it depends on the MS, but the narrative voice can definitely be a voice/character on its own, too. Thanks so much, Ellen!Ava Jaehttp://avajae.blogspot.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-606209712314101104.post-68033453546422197732014-11-27T15:52:06.162-08:002014-11-27T15:52:06.162-08:00Ava -- Another excellent post! I&#39;ve sounded of...Ava -- Another excellent post! I&#39;ve sounded off on &quot;voice&quot; myself (see https://ellenbooks.wordpress.com/2014/05/31/finding-your-voice-2/ ) to add the idea that narrative voice can be thought of as yet another character. A strong narrative voice -- regardless of whether the story is told in first, second, or third person -- can add personality to the telling of the story, or dimension in other ways. The example I use is historical fiction: when the story is told in the manner that (for example) 19th Century novels were written, then you have a distinctive voice for that particular novel. And it wouldn&#39;t be the voice of the author, either. So I put &quot;voice&quot; out there apart from even the author&#39;s natural storytelling style, and consider it another element of the book that has to fit as well any other piece.Ellennoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-606209712314101104.post-28251322812771518582014-11-19T03:28:23.331-08:002014-11-19T03:28:23.331-08:00Thanks, Lola! I agree—voice can be extremely subje...Thanks, Lola! I agree—voice can be <i>extremely</i> subjective, especially, I think, with stronger (and more unique) voices. I loved the <i>Shatter Me</i> series largely because of the voice, but I know there were definitely many like yourself who couldn&#39;t connect with it at all and thus hated it. (Which is understandable, because if you don&#39;t like the voice, enjoying the book is going to be much more difficult).Ava Jaehttp://avajae.blogspot.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-606209712314101104.post-28783121973141462312014-11-17T11:11:48.792-08:002014-11-17T11:11:48.792-08:00I usually call it writing style instead of voice, ...I usually call it writing style instead of voice, but I think this post is pretty spot on! Great post! It&#39;s really difficult to describe what voice is exactly or how to describe an author&#39;s voice.<br /><br />I think that voice/writing style is a very personal preference, whether a reader likes the voice or not, can really depend from person to person. A few authors have a writing style I connect with and I will probably read everything by them, just because of the writing style. It&#39;s also easier to get into a book when I like the writing style. On the other hand I couldn&#39;t stand the writing style of Shatter Me and it was one of the main reasons I DNF&#39;d the book, while I know many other people love it.Lola Rnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-606209712314101104.post-32224033600202756382014-11-17T10:09:26.633-08:002014-11-17T10:09:26.633-08:00That&#39;s a great point! Revisions can totally be...That&#39;s a great point! Revisions can totally be the perfect place to refine your voice. I like the buried/shovel analogy, too. Or you could look at is as a chisel. Either way, agree. :)Ava Jaehttp://avajae.blogspot.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-606209712314101104.post-7142478831421456122014-11-17T10:02:48.062-08:002014-11-17T10:02:48.062-08:00I agree that it takes lots of practice to develop ...I agree that it takes lots of practice to develop your own unique voice. And I think in revisions is where you can help to bring out and develop the voice in a manuscript if it&#39;s currently sort of &#39;buried&#39;. Revising for voice = get yer shovel! ;)Leandrahttp://www.leandrajwallace.blogspot.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-606209712314101104.post-44900224305879515782014-11-17T06:55:13.771-08:002014-11-17T06:55:13.771-08:00Ha ha no worries! :)Ha ha no worries! :)Ava Jaehttp://avajae.blogspot.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-606209712314101104.post-40372178628977404172014-11-17T06:54:30.880-08:002014-11-17T06:54:30.880-08:00OHHHH, that would make more sense. Yes, that would...OHHHH, that would make more sense. Yes, that would definitely do it. I was confused. XD Thanks for clearing that up.Heatherhttp://semilegacy.blogspot.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-606209712314101104.post-76366686708374139352014-11-17T06:51:36.990-08:002014-11-17T06:51:36.990-08:00Ahhh no no no. I don&#39;t mean innate like you&#3...Ahhh no no no. I don&#39;t mean innate like you&#39;re born with a great writing voice—I mean innate like it&#39;s something that develops naturally, subconsciously as you read and write. I definitely disagree with the talent argument, too.Ava Jaehttp://avajae.blogspot.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-606209712314101104.post-65637683476759036682014-11-17T06:48:45.902-08:002014-11-17T06:48:45.902-08:00That argument would make sense too. I recently rea...That argument would make sense too. I recently read a pretty painful book, and I can see how that forced voice would come through... But then I think the innate voice goes back to the talent vs. skill argument with writing, and I don&#39;t enjoy that one either. Blah.Heatherhttp://semilegacy.blogspot.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-606209712314101104.post-4653799631832291922014-11-17T06:19:17.278-08:002014-11-17T06:19:17.278-08:00Heh, so I take a middle ground with this. On one h...Heh, so I take a middle ground with this. On one hand, I agree that voice is innate, and I think when you focus on &quot;finding&quot; your voice, a lot of writers tend to...force it, I guess. That being said, the voice doesn&#39;t develop if you don&#39;t do anything, which is why I think it&#39;s so important to read widely and write plenty. :)Ava Jaehttp://avajae.blogspot.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-606209712314101104.post-3896057445095603242014-11-17T05:59:13.626-08:002014-11-17T05:59:13.626-08:00I think it&#39;s interesting, because earlier this...I think it&#39;s interesting, because earlier this week I read two blog posts, one giving advice on how to find writing voice and the other saying that trying to &quot;find your voice&quot; is ridiculous because it&#39;s innate. I think this helped, a little, not because it changed my mind but it put into words what I couldn&#39;t figure out before. &quot;If the reader doesn’t connect with or like the voice&quot; well then, perhaps an &#39;innate&#39; voice isn&#39;t the best key at all...<br /><br /><br />I know that voice is something I currently struggle with all. the. time. but I do think that Neal Shusterman and A.C. Gaughen have unique writing voices and some of my favorites, screw the criticisms on Goodreads.Heatherhttp://semilegacy.blogspot.com/noreply@blogger.com