Showing posts with label coauthorship. Show all posts
Showing posts with label coauthorship. Show all posts

Monday, January 15, 2018

Renewed invitation to coauthorship

I posted an invitation like this some years ago, but it's time to repost it: I am generally open to coauthoring articles based on blog posts. So if you like a post, and have ideas favorable to it, and you want to coauthor a paper based on it, write me. Tell me a bit about yourself and your ideas for the piece. I would prefer it if you knew the literature (which I often don't know very well--the blog posts are in all sorts of areas, including areas that I don't do active research in, and it wouldn't surprise me if many of them were rehashing ideas that were well known).

In the interests of full disclosure, I should say that last fall, I had two failed projects of this sort. In one, my coauthor, after about two drafts, found a fatal objection to the main argument. In the other, I found a fatal objection to the main argument. Alas, blog posts don't always materialize into good arguments.

Monday, July 25, 2016

Plagiarism and a repeat invitation

I am occasionally asked whether I am not afraid that someone will steal ideas from my blog and publish them. I'm not. If the ideas get published by someone else, that saves me the trouble of writing them up myself. Hopefully they will give credit where credit is due and it won't be theft.

Moreover, I invite anybody competent who wants to coauthor a paper with me by starting with the ideas in a post, working out the details and writing up a first draft. (Check with me first before getting to work, though.) In the philosophical profession, coauthored papers count pretty much the same as single-authored, so plagiarizing would involve unnecessary risk for very minor benefit.

Monday, May 26, 2008

Invitation to coauthorship

These posts differ in character. Some are reflections, some are humor, but some are a few serious philosophical arguments that could, perhaps, form the heart of a scholarly article (or conference presentation). If you are a philosopher who thinks this is true of some post, and you have some ideas on how to develop what I said, and would be interested in co-writing that article with me, please email me (arpruss at gmail dot com), telling me a little about yourself, and how you would see this project.